K. GALINSKY: Augustan Culture. an Interpretive Introduction. + , 6 pls, ills . Princeton: Princeton University Press, Cased, $/? Buy Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction New Ed by Karl Galinsky ( ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free . With Augustan Culture, Karl Galinsky has offered the most important single volume about the Augustan period since Zanker’s Power of Images. Galinsky’s.
|Published (Last):||27 December 2009|
|PDF File Size:||17.23 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In other words, this book should not merely be consulted. Further, assimilation to divinities and heroes such as Hercules, Mercury, and especially Apollo accomplished a similar goal All Latin is translated; all ideas are thoroughly explored; illustrations abound; I think this is an excellent text.
In a brief preliminary survey of recent scholarly approaches Galinsky sets out the three essential aspects of the Res Publica which Augustus claimed to restore: I find this thesis interesting because we also see this kind of “reverse psychology” in Augustus’ dealings with the Roman Balinsky. Recent criticism has shown us that perhaps a better way to read Livy is to consider him as a literary figure in his own right.
Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction
In his analysis of the Augustus of Prima Porta, Galinsky brings together several strands of recent scholarship on the statue. Galinsky’s finest work on Horace emerges at the close of his discussion of this author when he compares Odes augusfan to the Ara Pacis. One might even argue cf.
Ironically for those of us who were educated in Europe. The fact that just two of aufustan seven provinces in the Greek east had cults of Augustus, Galinsky believes, is attributable largely to the emperor’s own reluctance to be worshipped As he moves on to consider the portrait busts of the emperor, G.
Citing the famous Jupiter prophecy Aen.
In the opening chapter Galinsky also sets up a useful distinction between two types of leader: Throughout the east, Octavian resisted the idea that he should himself be referred to as theos; rather, he allowed shrines to be set up to himself only by non-citizens and only when his person was specifically linked to the goddess Roma. Open Preview See a Problem? Citing Keuls, Galinsky mentions that the grief of the Danaids generally parallels that of Aeneas Vengeance and killing may have been a galinskyy of this galinsy and of the Roman psyche, but mercy is also a part, perhaps the most striking part, of this tale, as well.
Wil rated it really liked it Jun 08, That aside, however, Galinsky certainly does a good job of interpreting Augustus’ reforms in the best light possible. Augustus joined this society even though some of its members had formerly been his enemies. Turning to the question of personal morality, Galinsky concedes that “there is little doubt that Octavian sowed some wild oats” He could have also mentioned the ancilia that were said to have dropped from heaven during the reign of Numa and in Aen.
Bryn Mawr Classical Review
Richard Thomas’ “insatiable toil occupied all areas of existence” v. Its floruit was the Augustan period. It includes a Victory figure and Augustus himself presenting statuettes of the Lares to Vestal Virgins. Propagation of the new order, then, equals propagation of emperor.
This abets, augusgan perhaps even creates, a dynamic between the poet and reader. Galinsky spends several pages demonstrating not only the purpose behind the structure, but describing in some detail the way it appeared in zugustan original form. To ask other readers questions about Augustan Culturegalineky sign up. In Chapter 6 Galinsky argues that close examination of religion provides a “textbook illustration” of Augustus’ auctoritas in action.
Taking a page out of reader response criticism, he suggests that this depends on the involvement of the viewer. Weaving analysis and narrative throughout a richly illustrated text, Galinsky provides not only an enjoyable account of the major ideas of the age, but also an interpretation of the creative tensions and contradictions that made for its vitality and influence.
Thus ideology precedes the narrative history of Chapter 2: The lavish building program begun by Caesar and augmented and completed by Augustus also reflected his auctoritas. Hence his refortifying and ennobling of such sodalities had a healing effect on a society hitherto lacerated by civil strife.
Corbeill puts forward provocative views, and, although I remain unpersuaded by most of them. Self-glorification on the part of private individuals was therefore tolerated under Augustus.
He does well to point up the inconsistency of the orthodox opinions, dismissing the rigid classifications of Augustan portraiture such as “Actium type,” which he reveals not only to be an anachronistic misnomer, but xugustan one that implies too strong a break between styles.
In Galinsky’s judgment Augustus is a transforming leader, a shaper of values who “sounded the note of moral revitalization and followed through on it; it was a time for rededicating the state to values, virtues and ideals” In short, my objection to G. His comparison of galinskj and literature is especially valuable. In Chapter 2 Galihsky suggests that Augustus freed the tottering res publica from disaster and he assembles several examples of the theme of Augustus as liberator in Roman coinage.
Even as the father was the head of the family, so Augustus was the father and head of the state.
Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction by Karl Galinsky
Erin Katz rated it liked it Nov 30, This articulation is very important not only for art historians but for anyone who wishes to grasp the richness of associations present in the art, as much as the literature, of the Augustan period. In his consideration of Augustus’ moral agenda, G. While Augustus’ precise motives will perhaps always be debated, his actions and their ramifications can be considered more objectively.
The emperor preferred to herald his auctoritas by a great number of portrait busts augutan honorific inscriptions erected to him.
I nevertheless believe that they should be closely considered by all students of the late Republic. But while many readers will become immediately engaged with Galinsky’s reading of the Princeps and his ideology, this reviewer must postpone the temptation to discuss the emperor and his historian until she has clearly indicated the structure and strengths of this splendid synoptic study.
This is an essential dynamic of Augustan culture” Octavian’s grasp for power, Galinsky admits, “had been accompanied by a bloodbath and a ruthlessness that appalled even contemporaries calloused by previous civil wars” Livvii Edwards rated it really liked it Jan 27, Jim Westcot rated it it was amazing Nov 29,